U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Guy Lancaster Richmond v. Warden Waters Attorney General of the State of Maryland

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 5, 1996

87 F.3d 1309; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 32177; 1996 WL 295246 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Opinion

87 F.3d 1309

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Guy Lancaster RICHMOND, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Warden WATERS; Attorney General of the State of Maryland,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 96-6171.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 16, 1996.
Decided: June 5, 1996.

Guy Lancaster Richmond, Appellant Pro Se.

Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Richmond v. Waters, No. CA-95-2901 (D.Md. Jan. 22, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.