Yarborough v. Lofton
Yarborough v. Lofton
Opinion
87 F.3d 1310
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Danny Lamont YARBOROUGH, Plaintiff--Appellant,
and
Delwin Earl Harris, Plaintiff,
v.
Joseph LOFTON; S.D. Stewart; Johnnie Lee, and Medical
Staff; Lynn Phillips; Finesse G. Couch, and staff;
William Jennette; Officer Lancaster; C.P. Hines; Glen
Britt; Ted Ferell; Vzzell; Ida Reaney, Defendants--Appellees.
No. 96-6145.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 16, 1996.
Decided: June 5, 1996.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, District Judge. (CA-95-761-5-CT-BR)
Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Danny Lamont Yarborough, Appellant Pro Se.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Yarborough v. Lofton, No. CA-95-761-5-CT-BR (E.D.N.C. Nov. 2, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.