John Nathan Quidley v. W.O. Leary
John Nathan Quidley v. W.O. Leary
Opinion
89 F.3d 829
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
John Nathan QUIDLEY, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
W.O. LEARY, Defendant--Appellee.
No. 96-6349.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted June 20, 1996.
Decided July 2, 1996.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (CA-96-141-BO).
John Nathan Quidley, Appellant Pro Se.
E.D.N.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Quidley v. Leary, No. CA-96-141-BO (E.D.N.C. Feb. 23, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.