U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Richard A. Massenburg v. Warden, Greensville Correctional Center

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 6, 1996

89 F.3d 829; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 34512; 1996 WL 333235 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Opinion

89 F.3d 829

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Richard A. MASSENBURG, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
WARDEN, GREENSVILLE CORRECTIONAL CENTER, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 96-6309.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 16, 1996.

Decided June 6, 1996.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. David G. Lowe, Magistrate Judge. (CA-95-857).

Richard A. Massenburg, Appellant Pro Se. Robert H. Anderson, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

E.D.Va.

DISMISSED.

Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the magistrate judge's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition.* We have reviewed the record and the magistrate judge's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. Massenburg v. Warden, No. CA-95-857 (E.D.Va. Feb. 8, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

The parties consented to the exercise of jurisdiction by a magistrate judge under 28 U.S.C.A. § 636(c)(1) (West 1993)

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.