Pamela Jean Watson v. City of Raleigh, Raleigh Police Department
Pamela Jean Watson v. City of Raleigh, Raleigh Police Department
Opinion
89 F.3d 831
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Pamela Jean WATSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
CITY OF RALEIGH, Raleigh Police Department, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 96-6408.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted May 16, 1996.
Decided June 6, 1996.
Pamela Jean Watson, Appellant Pro Se.
Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Watson v. City of Raleigh, No. CA-96-65-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Feb. 22, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.