Juan Fitzgerald Allen v. James B. Hunt, Jr. Ralph Stamey
Juan Fitzgerald Allen v. James B. Hunt, Jr. Ralph Stamey
Opinion
91 F.3d 128
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Juan Fitzgerald ALLEN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
James B. HUNT, Jr.; Ralph Stamey, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 96-6259.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: July 23, 1996.
Decided: July 31, 1996.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District Judge. (CA-96-72-F)
Juan Fitzgerald Allen, Appellant Pro Se.
E.D.N.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Allen v. Hunt, No. CA-96-72-F (E.D.N.C. Feb. 7, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.