U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Orville W. Davis v. Olav H. Alvig, Doctor Dirck Brenlinger, Doctor Tien D. Nguyen, Doctor

Orville W. Davis v. Olav H. Alvig, Doctor Dirck Brenlinger, Doctor Tien D. Nguyen, Doctor
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided July 1, 1996
91 F.3d 129; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 35068; 1996 WL 380252 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Orville W. Davis v. Olav H. Alvig, Doctor Dirck Brenlinger, Doctor Tien D. Nguyen, Doctor

Opinion

91 F.3d 129

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Orville W. DAVIS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Olav H. ALVIG, Doctor; Dirck Brenlinger, Doctor; Tien D.
Nguyen, Doctor Defendants-Appellees.

No. 96-6262.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted June 20, 1996.
Decided July 1, 1996.

Orville W. Davis, Appellant Pro Se.

Anthony John Trenga, John E. Coffey, HAZEL & THOMAS, P.C., Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellees.

Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Davis v. Alvig, No. CA-95-686-R (W.D.Va. Feb. 12, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.