Clyde K. Futrell v. John Ashton Wray, Jr.
Clyde K. Futrell v. John Ashton Wray, Jr.
Opinion
91 F.3d 130
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Clyde K. FUTRELL, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
John Ashton WRAY, Jr., Defendant--Appellee.
No. 96-6678.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted June 20, 1996.
Decided July 3, 1996.
Clyde K. Futrell, Appellant Pro Se.
Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing as frivolous his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Futrell v. Wray, No. CA-96-346 (E.D.Va. Apr. 12, 1996). We deny Appellant's motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.