U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Anthony Edward Henderson v. William Smith, Warden Attorney General of the State of Maryland

Anthony Edward Henderson v. William Smith, Warden Attorney General of the State of Maryland
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided July 9, 1996
91 F.3d 130; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 35092; 1996 WL 380842 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Anthony Edward Henderson v. William Smith, Warden Attorney General of the State of Maryland

Opinion

91 F.3d 130

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Anthony Edward HENDERSON, Petitioner--Appellant,
v.
William SMITH, Warden; Attorney General of the State of
Maryland, Respondents--Appellees.

No. 96-6339.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: June 20, 1996
Decided: July 9, 1996

Anthony Edward Henderson, Appellant Pro Se.

John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Ann Norman Bosse, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Henderson v. Smith, No. CA-95-2989-JFM (D.Md. Feb. 29, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.