U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Morgan v. Cavanaugh

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 27, 1996

91 F.3d 132; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 35140; 1996 WL 380247 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Opinion

91 F.3d 132

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Nathaniel MORGAN, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
Michael J. CAVANAUGH, Commissioner of the South Carolina
Department of Probation, Parole and Services;
South Carolina Department of Probation,
Parole and Pardon Services,
Defendants--Appellees.

No. 95-7593.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted June 20, 1996.
Decided June 27, 1996.

Nathaniel Morgan, Appellant Pro Se. Carl Norman Lundberg, SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PROBATION, PAROLE & PARDON SERVICES, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Morgan v. Cavanaugh, No. CA-94-3389-3-19BC (D.S.C. Sept. 7, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.