U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

James Robert Scott v. Pat Chavis Franklin Freeman R.C. Lewis Ruby S. Brandon M. Strickland

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided July 9, 1996

91 F.3d 133; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 35164; 1996 WL 380847 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Opinion

91 F.3d 133

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
James Robert SCOTT, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Pat CHAVIS; Franklin Freeman; R.C. Lewis; Ruby S.
Brandon; M. Strickland, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 96-6213.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted June 20, 1996.
Decided July 9, 1996.

James Robert Scott, Appellant Pro Se.

Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Scott v. Chavis, No. CA-95-920-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Jan. 26, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.