Delonte E. Taylor v. William L. Smith, Warden Attorney General of the State of Maryland
Delonte E. Taylor v. William L. Smith, Warden Attorney General of the State of Maryland
Opinion
91 F.3d 134
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Delonte E. TAYLOR, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
William L. SMITH, Warden; Attorney General of the State of
Maryland, Respondents-Appellees.
No. 96-6314.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: July 23, 1996.
Decided: July 31, 1996.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (CA-95-1822-AW)
Delonte E. Taylor, Appellant Pro Se.
D.Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his habeas corpus petition filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988), as amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penaly Act of 1996, Pub.L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1217. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Taylor v. Smith, No. CA-95-1822-AW (D.Md. Jan. 29, 1996). We deny Appellant's motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.