United States v. Emmanuel Ikechukwu Anudu, A/K/A Cletis, A/K/A Claytus
United States v. Emmanuel Ikechukwu Anudu, A/K/A Cletis, A/K/A Claytus
Opinion
91 F.3d 134
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee,
v.
Emmanuel Ikechukwu ANUDU, a/k/a Cletis, a/k/a Claytus,
Defendant--Appellant.
No. 96-6223.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted July 23, 1996.
Decided July 31, 1996.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. John R. Hargrove, Senior District Judge. (CR-91-305-HAR)
Emmanuel Ikechukwu Anudu, Appellant Pro Se.
Robert Reeves Harding, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
D.Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his Fed.R.Crim.P. 41(e) motion for return of property. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Anudu, No. CR-91-305-HAR (D.Md. Nov. 21, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.