United States v. Roberto Spalding, A/K/A Pepito, A/K/A Pops
United States v. Roberto Spalding, A/K/A Pepito, A/K/A Pops
Opinion
91 F.3d 136
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Roberto SPALDING, a/k/a Pepito, a/k/a Pops, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 96-6327.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: July 23, 1996.
Decided: July 31, 1996.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. J. Calvitt Clarke, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-90-105)
Roberto Spalding, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Marie Everhart, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, VA, for Appellee.
E.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his motion for modification of sentence. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Spalding, No. CR-90-105 (E.D.Va. Feb. 2, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.