U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Ralph Alexander-El v. Warren, Correctional Dietary Sergeant Foster, Correctional Dietary Sergeant

Ralph Alexander-El v. Warren, Correctional Dietary Sergeant Foster, Correctional Dietary Sergeant
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 5, 1996
92 F.3d 1176; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 25546; 1996 WL 437001 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)
Ralph Alexander-El v. Warren, Correctional Dietary Sergeant Foster, Correctional Dietary Sergeant

Cases that cite this one

22 later published cases cite this decision. The 20 that cite it most often are listed here.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

92 F.3d 1176

Ralph ALEXANDER-EL, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
WARREN, Correctional Dietary Sergeant; Foster, Correctional
Dietary Sergeant, Defendants--Appellees.

No. 96-6388.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: July 23, 1996
Decided: August 5, 1996

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Alexander-El v. Warren, No. CA-96-459-AW (D.Md. Feb. 26, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.