U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Mary B. Holmes v. Klaus H. Buntua Ellen Myint, and Albert N. Fuduka

Mary B. Holmes v. Klaus H. Buntua Ellen Myint, and Albert N. Fuduka
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided July 30, 1996
92 F.3d 1179; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 25636; 1996 WL 423048 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Mary B. Holmes v. Klaus H. Buntua Ellen Myint, and Albert N. Fuduka

Opinion

92 F.3d 1179

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Mary B. HOLMES, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Klaus H. BUNTUA; Ellen Myint, Defendants-Appellees,
and
Albert N. FUDUKA, Defendant.

No. 96-1167.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted July 23, 1996.
Decided July 30, 1996.

Mary B. Holmes, Appellant Pro Se.

James Joseph Kelley, II, MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order granting Appellee's motion to dismiss Appellant's civil action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Holmes v. Buntua, No. CA-95-1582-A (E.D.Va. Jan. 4, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.