Franklin Hewitt v. Doctor Fender
Franklin Hewitt v. Doctor Fender
Opinion
92 F.3d 1179
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Franklin HEWITT, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Doctor FENDER, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 96-6063.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Aug. 7, 1996.
Submitted July 25, 1996.
Decided Aug. 7, 1996.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Dennis W. Shedd, District Judge. (CA-95-667-0-19)
Franklin Hewitt, Appellant Pro Se. William Henry Davidson, II, ELLIS, LAWHORNE, DAVIDSON & SIMS, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
D.S.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before LUTTIG and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Hewitt v. Fender, No. CA-95-667-0-19 (D.S.C. Jan. 4, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.