United States v. Antonio Bland, A/K/A Anthony Scott Lloyd
United States v. Antonio Bland, A/K/A Anthony Scott Lloyd
Opinion
92 F.3d 1182
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Antonio BLAND, a/k/a Anthony Scott Lloyd, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 95-8557.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted July 23, 1996.
Decided July 30, 1996.
Antonio Bland, Appellant Pro Se.
Arenda L. Wright Allen, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his habeas motion, 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988), as amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub.L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1217. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Bland, Nos. CR-93-39-NN; CA-94-80-4 (E.D.Va. Oct. 20, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.