U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Van Prince Welch v. George Allen Ronald Angelone D.T. Mahon

Van Prince Welch v. George Allen Ronald Angelone D.T. Mahon
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 5, 1996
92 F.3d 1184; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 25822; 1996 WL 436570 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Van Prince Welch v. George Allen Ronald Angelone D.T. Mahon

Opinion

92 F.3d 1184

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Van Prince WELCH, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
George ALLEN; Ronald Angelone; D.T. Mahon, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 96-6613.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted July 23, 1996.
Decided Aug. 5, 1996.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (CA-95-315-R)

Van Prince Welch, Appellant Pro Se. Susan Campbell Alexander, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

W.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Welch v. Allen, No. CA-95-315-R (W.D.Va. Apr. 9, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.