U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

David Glover v. State of South Carolina Attorney General of the State of South Carolina

David Glover v. State of South Carolina Attorney General of the State of South Carolina
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 20, 1996
94 F.3d 641; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 36676; 1996 WL 469753 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

David Glover v. State of South Carolina Attorney General of the State of South Carolina

Opinion

94 F.3d 641

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
David GLOVER, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
STATE of South Carolina; Attorney General of the State of
South Carolina, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 96-6398.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Aug. 20, 1996.

David Glover, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Before MURNAGHAN and ERVIN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub.L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal; to the extent that a certificate of appealability is required, we deny such a certificate. We dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Glover v. South Carolina, No. CA-95-2125-2-17AJ (D.S.C. Feb. 27, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.