U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

United States v. Chokwuemeka Nwaorisa Anyaehie, A/K/A Emeka

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 20, 1996

94 F.3d 642; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 36731; 1996 WL 469754 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Opinion

94 F.3d 642

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Chokwuemeka Nwaorisa ANYAEHIE, a/k/a Emeka, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 96-6385.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Aug. 20, 1996.

Chokwuemeka Nwaorisa Anyaehie, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen S. Zimmermann, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.

Before MURNAGHAN and ERVIN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his habeas motion, 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub.L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Anyaehie, Nos. CR-93-145-L; CA-95-1935-L (D.Md. Feb. 27, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.