U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Benjamin Shabazz Peay v. Nurse Guiton Doctor Lindsey Stephen Kaftan, and George L. McBane U.S. Marshal

Benjamin Shabazz Peay v. Nurse Guiton Doctor Lindsey Stephen Kaftan, and George L. McBane U.S. Marshal
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 14, 1996
94 F.3d 642; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 36741; 1996 WL 457200 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Benjamin Shabazz Peay v. Nurse Guiton Doctor Lindsey Stephen Kaftan, and George L. McBane U.S. Marshal

Opinion

94 F.3d 642

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Benjamin Shabazz PEAY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Nurse GUITON; Doctor Lindsey; Stephen Kaftan, Defendants-Appellees,
and
George L. McBANE, U.S. Marshal, Defendant.

No. 96-6688.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted June 28, 1996.
Decided Aug. 14, 1996.

Benjamin Shabazz Peay, Appellant Pro Se.

Susan Moore Lewis, COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM

1

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's orders and opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Peay v. Guiton, No. CA-94-520-2 (M.D.N.C. July 6, 1995; Mar. 29, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.