U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Frank Ervin Altizer, Jr. v. Alan Katz Mary E. Shea, Esquire Pamela A. Sargent T.P. Kagey Buchanan County Circuit Court Unknown

Frank Ervin Altizer, Jr. v. Alan Katz Mary E. Shea, Esquire Pamela A. Sargent T.P. Kagey Buchanan County Circuit Court Unknown
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 21, 1996
95 F.3d 41; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 37361; 1996 WL 472440 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Frank Ervin Altizer, Jr. v. Alan Katz Mary E. Shea, Esquire Pamela A. Sargent T.P. Kagey Buchanan County Circuit Court Unknown

Opinion

95 F.3d 41

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Frank Ervin ALTIZER, Jr., Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
Alan KATZ; Mary E. Shea, Esquire; Pamela A. Sargent; T.P.
Kagey; Buchanan County Circuit Court; Unknown
Defendants, Defendants--Appellees.

No. 96-6530.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 15, 1996.
Decided Aug. 21, 1996.

Frank Ervin Altizer, Jr., appellant Pro Se.

Before MURNAGHAN and ERVIN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Altizer v. Katz, No. CA-96-241-R (W.D.Va. Mar. 8, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.