Jones v. Smith
Jones v. Smith
Opinion
95 F.3d 42
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Steven E. JONES, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
William L. SMITH, Warden; John F. Himmel, Jr.,
Classification Case Management; Bernice Allen,
Classification Supervisor; John Locklear, Case Management
Specialist; Larry Satterfield, Sui, Supervisor, in their
individual and official capacities, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 96-6337.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: August 22, 1996.
Decided: September 3, 1996.
Steven E. Jones, Appellant Pro Se.
Before HALL, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Jones v. Smith, No. CA-96-460-S (D.Md. Mar. 1, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.