United States v. Nathaniel Hoover
United States v. Nathaniel Hoover
Opinion
95 F.3d 42
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee,
v.
Nathaniel HOOVER, Defendant--Appellant.
No. 96-6777.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 15, 1996.
Decided Aug. 21, 1996.
Nathaniel Hoover, appellant Pro Se. Gretchen C.F. Shappert, Asst. U.S. Atty., Charlotte, NC, for appellee.
Before MURNAGHAN and ERVIN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals district court's denial of his "motion to proceed without extra time." We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1988), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1988); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.
We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. In light of this disposition, we also deny Appellant's motion for bail pending appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.