U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Kendrick v. Clinton

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 1, 1996

97 F.3d 1447; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 30462; 1996 WL 555274 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Opinion

97 F.3d 1447

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Richard Wade KENDRICK, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Bill CLINTON; Janet Reno; Department of justice; U.S.
District Court for the Western District of
Virginia; James Turk, Judge; Federal
Court of Appeals, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 96-6594.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 20, 1996.
Decided Oct. 1, 1996.

Richard Wade Kendrick, Appellant Pro Se.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Kendrick v. Clinton, No. CA-96-346-AM (E.D.Va. Mar. 14, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.