Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Julian Edward Rochester v. Bobby E. Busch, Director Lieutenant Summey Don Blackwell, Mr. Cindy Doe, Ms. Oconee County

Julian Edward Rochester v. Bobby E. Busch, Director Lieutenant Summey Don Blackwell, Mr. Cindy Doe, Ms. Oconee County
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 1, 1996
97 F.3d 1448; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 30488; 1996 WL 555291 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Julian Edward Rochester v. Bobby E. Busch, Director Lieutenant Summey Don Blackwell, Mr. Cindy Doe, Ms. Oconee County

Opinion

97 F.3d 1448

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Julian Edward ROCHESTER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Bobby E. BUSCH, Director; Lieutenant Summey; Don
Blackwell, Mr.; Cindy Doe, Ms.; Oconee County,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 96-6294.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 20, 1996.
Decided Oct. 1, 1996.

Julian Edward Rochester, Appellant Pro Se. William Henry Davidson, II, John Thomas Lay, Jr., ELLIS, LAWHORNE, DAVIDSON & SIMS, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Rochester v. Busch, No. CA-95-169-2-21-AJ (D.S.C. Jan. 22, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑