U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Michael Steven Sayko v. Richard A. Lanham, Sr. J. Joseph Curran, Jr. Alan D. Eason Marlene Lougar J. Hemler Kathy Grant Stace Donohoo

Michael Steven Sayko v. Richard A. Lanham, Sr. J. Joseph Curran, Jr. Alan D. Eason Marlene Lougar J. Hemler Kathy Grant Stace Donohoo
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 5, 1996
97 F.3d 1448; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 30510; 1996 WL 500923 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Michael Steven Sayko v. Richard A. Lanham, Sr. J. Joseph Curran, Jr. Alan D. Eason Marlene Lougar J. Hemler Kathy Grant Stace Donohoo

Opinion

97 F.3d 1448

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Michael Steven SAYKO, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Richard A. LANHAM, Sr.; J. Joseph Curran, Jr.; Alan D.
Eason; Marlene Lougar; J. Hemler; Kathy Grant;
Stace Donohoo, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 96-6824.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 22, 1996.
Decided Sept. 5, 1996.

Michael Steven Sayko, Appellant Pro Se.

Before HALL, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Sayko v. Lanham, No. CA-96-1055-AW (D.Md. Apr. 17, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.