Simms v. Taylor
Simms v. Taylor
Opinion
97 F.3d 1449
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
David M. SIMMS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
John B. TAYLOR; Robert B. Bond, Psychologist; Larry
Huffman; Medical Department, Buckingham Correctional
Center; Security Staff at Buck Ingham Correctional Center;
Captain Booker; Lieutenant Smith; Henry Ponton; R. Kelly;
Unknown Nurses And Doctors, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 96-6669.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 20, 1996.
Decided Oct. 1, 1996.
David M. Simms, Appellant Pro Se. Mary Elizabeth Shea, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia; Powell Murry Leitch, III, FLIPPIN, DENSMORE, MORSE, RUTHERFORD & JESSEE, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellees.
W.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Simms v. Taylor, No. CA-95-259-R (W.D.Va. Apr. 17, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.