U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

United States v. Charles Anderson Miller, A/K/A Sonny Miller, A/K/A Bubba

United States v. Charles Anderson Miller, A/K/A Sonny Miller, A/K/A Bubba
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 2, 1996
97 F.3d 1450; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 30651; 1996 WL 558375 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

United States v. Charles Anderson Miller, A/K/A Sonny Miller, A/K/A Bubba

Opinion

97 F.3d 1450

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee,
v.
Charles Anderson MILLER, a/k/a Sonny Miller, a/k/a Bubba,
Defendant--Appellant.

No. 96-7039.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 20, 1996
Decided Oct. 2, 1996

Charles Anderson Miller, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Daniel Potter, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

E.D.N.C.

DISMISSED.

Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Miller, Nos. CR-90-60; CA-96-434-5-BR (E.D.N.C. June 26, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.