United States v. Gbolahan Francis Tayo, A/K/A Douglas Warren Johnson, A/K/A John Doe
United States v. Gbolahan Francis Tayo, A/K/A Douglas Warren Johnson, A/K/A John Doe
Opinion
97 F.3d 1450
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Gbolahan Francis TAYO, a/k/a Douglas Warren Johnson, a/k/a
John Doe, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 96-6563.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 20, 1996.
Decided Oct. 1, 1996.
Gbolahan Francis Tayo, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas B. Murphy, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
E.D.N.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying Appellant's motion for modification of sentence. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Tayo, No. CR-95-28-BR; CA-95-106-5 (E.D.N.C. Mar. 29, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.