U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

United States v. Gary Lee Skinner

United States v. Gary Lee Skinner
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 17, 1996
97 F.3d 1450; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 30674; 1996 WL 525540 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

United States v. Gary Lee Skinner

Opinion

97 F.3d 1450

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee,
v.
Gary Lee SKINNER, Defendant--Appellant.

No. 96-6173.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Sept. 17, 1996.

Gary Lee Skinner, Appellant Pro Se. Jane H. Jolly, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub.L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214, motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Skinner, No. CR-94-122-F (E.D.N.C. Jan. 16, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.