U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

United States v. Manuel Ramon Luna

United States v. Manuel Ramon Luna
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 1, 1996
97 F.3d 1450; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 30656; 1996 WL 555286 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

United States v. Manuel Ramon Luna

Opinion

97 F.3d 1450

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Manuel Ramon LUNA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 96-6407.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 20, 1996.
Decided Oct. 1, 1996.

Manuel Ramon Luna, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Charles Kay, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his motion filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994), as amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub.L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214, and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Luna, Nos. CR-91-075-WMN; CA-95-1952-WMN (D. Md. Nov. 15, 1995; Feb. 12, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.