U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

United States v. Aaron Brockington

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 9, 1996

98 F.3d 1335; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 40085; 1996 WL 578670 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Opinion

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Aaron BROCKINGTON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 96-6813.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 24, 1996.
Decided Oct. 9, 1996.

Aaron Brockington, Appellant Pro Se. Joan Elizabeth Evans, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Aaron Brockington appeals from the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub.L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Brockington, Nos. CR-90-100; CA-96-5-3 (E.D. Va. April 10, 1996, May 9, 1996). We deny Brockington's motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.