U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

United States v. Charles Hutson

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 15, 1996

98 F.3d 1336; 1996 WL 590570 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Opinion

98 F.3d 1336

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee,
v.
Charles HUTSON, Defendant--Appellant.

No. 96-7206.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 30, 1996.
Decided Oct. 15, 1996.

Charles Hutson, Appellant Pro Se. John Eric Evenson, II, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before HALL, NIEMEYER, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Charles Hutson appeals from the district court's order denying his motion for relief filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub.L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Hutson, Nos. CR-94-130-F; CA-96-274-F (E.D.N.C. July 15, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. Appellant's motion for remand is denied.

DISMISSED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.