Beamon v. Angelone
Beamon v. Angelone
Opinion
99 F.3d 1129
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
John BEAMON, Jr., Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
Ronald J. ANGELONE; F.G. Settle; C.D. Larsen; Y. Scott;
L.M. Saunders; J. Lee; F.S. Taylor; M. Neeley; J.
Caruso; V. Grant; John B. Metzger, Iii; Sandra Combs;
Winnie R. Dixon; Joseph F. Lewis; Linda R. Pitman,
Defendants--Appellees.
No. 96-6851.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Oct. 17, 1996.
Decided Oct. 24, 1996.
John Beamon, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Susan Campbell Alexander, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
W.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Beamon v. Angelone, No. CA-95-1024-R (W.D.Va. Apr. 22, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.