U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

George Earl Perry v. Betsy Davis Beamer, Secretary of the Commonwealth

George Earl Perry v. Betsy Davis Beamer, Secretary of the Commonwealth
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 25, 1996
99 F.3d 1130; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 40552; 1996 WL 614688 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

George Earl Perry v. Betsy Davis Beamer, Secretary of the Commonwealth

Opinion

99 F.3d 1130

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
George Earl PERRY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Betsy Davis BEAMER, Secretary of the Commonwealth, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 96-7281.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 17, 1996.
Decided Oct. 25, 1996.

George Earl Perry, Appellant Pro Se.

James Walter Hopper, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Perry v. Beamer, No. CA-96-265 (E.D.Va. July 26, 1996). We deny Appellant's motion for oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.