U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Tommy Lee Null v. United States

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 25, 1996

99 F.3d 1130; 1996 WL 614784 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Opinion

99 F.3d 1130

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Tommy Lee NULL, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 96-6874.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 17, 1996.
Decided Oct. 25, 1996.

Tommy Lee Null, Appellant Pro Se. Rebecca A. Betts, United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order adopting the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his Bivens* complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) (1994), amended by Prison Litigation Reform Act, Pub.L. No. 104-134, 110 Stat. 1321 (1996). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the on the reasoning of the district court. Null v. United States, No. CA-96-376-6 (S.D.W.Va. May 15, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971)

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.