U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

McNamara v. Glendening

McNamara v. Glendening
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 10, 1996
99 F.3d 1130; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 40540; 1996 WL 582889 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

McNamara v. Glendening

Opinion

99 F.3d 1130

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Gary N. McNAMARA, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Parris N. GLENDENING, Governor, State of Maryland; Nelson
Sabatini, Secretary, Maryland Department of Health and
Mental Hygiene; Mary K. Noren, Superintendent, Eastern
Shore Hos pital Center; David Williamson, M.D., Director of
Forensic Psychiatry, Eastern Shore Hos pital Center; Kevin
J. Richards, PH.D., Staff Psychologist, Clifton T. Perkins
Hospital Center; Joel J. Todd, State's Attorney for
Worchester County; Gary Mumford, State's Attorney for
Worchester County; Anita Earp Robinson, Administrative Law
Judge; Raul Lopez, Psychiatrist, Eastern Shore Hospital
Center, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 96-6546.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 3, 1996.
Decided Oct. 10, 1996.

Gary N. McNamara, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Susan Renee Steinberg, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. McNamara v. Glendening, No. CA-95-2138-AMD (D. Md. Mar. 12 & 28, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.