U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Michael P. Tully Larry Daniel Bratt v. Parris N. Glendening, Governor Maryland Parole Commission

Michael P. Tully Larry Daniel Bratt v. Parris N. Glendening, Governor Maryland Parole Commission
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 10, 1996
99 F.3d 1131; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 40161; 1996 WL 582890 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Michael P. Tully Larry Daniel Bratt v. Parris N. Glendening, Governor Maryland Parole Commission

Opinion

99 F.3d 1131

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Michael P. TULLY; Larry Daniel Bratt, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
Parris N. GLENDENING, Governor; Maryland Parole Commission,
Defendants--Appellees.

No. 96-6535.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 3, 1996.
Decided Oct. 10, 1996.

Michael P. Tully, Larry Daniel Bratt, Appellants Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Richard Bruce Rosenblatt, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Tully v. Glendening, No. CA-95-3617-JFM (D.Md. Feb. 29, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.