Cornelius Tucker, Jr. v. Sergeant Seiber Custodian Fox Sergeant Austin McWilliams
Cornelius Tucker, Jr. v. Sergeant Seiber Custodian Fox Sergeant Austin McWilliams
Opinion
99 F.3d 1131
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Cornelius TUCKER, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Sergeant SEIBER; Custodian Fox; Sergeant Austin;
McWilliams, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 96-6523.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Oct. 17, 1996.
Decided: Oct. 24, 1996.
Cornelius Tucker, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
E.D.N.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his motion for reconsideration of the entry of a pre-filing injunction. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Tucker v. Seiber, No. CA-93-215-CRT-F (E.D.N.C. Mar. 18, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.