U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Billy Truman Wingo v. Sergeant King, Pulaski Correctional Unit Correctional Officer Hammer, Pulaski Correctional Unit

Billy Truman Wingo v. Sergeant King, Pulaski Correctional Unit Correctional Officer Hammer, Pulaski Correctional Unit
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 25, 1996
99 F.3d 1133; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 39773; 1996 WL 614778 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Billy Truman Wingo v. Sergeant King, Pulaski Correctional Unit Correctional Officer Hammer, Pulaski Correctional Unit

Opinion

99 F.3d 1133

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Billy Truman WINGO, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Sergeant KING, Pulaski Correctional Unit; Correctional
Officer Hammer, Pulaski Correctional Unit,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 96-7028.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 17, 1996/
Decided Oct. 25, 1996.

Billy Truman Wingo, Appellant Pro Se. Susan Campbell Alexander, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Judge. (CA-96-365)

Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Wingo v. King, No. CA-96-365 (W.D.Va. June 25, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.