Frank Lee Garrett v. James S. Gilmore, Iii, Attorney General Daniel T. Mahon
Frank Lee Garrett v. James S. Gilmore, Iii, Attorney General Daniel T. Mahon
Opinion
103 F.3d 117
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Frank Lee GARRETT, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
James S. GILMORE, III, Attorney General; Daniel T. Mahon,
Defendants--Appellees.
No. 96-6901.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Nov. 7, 1996.
Decided Nov. 19, 1996.
Frank Lee Garrett, Appellant Pro Se.
Jill Theresa Bowers, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
W.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before RUSSELL and WIDENER, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Garrett v. Gilmore, No. CA-95-1230-R (W.D.Va. May 1, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.