United States v. Cornell Blackwell

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
United States v. Cornell Blackwell, 103 F.3d 120 (4th Cir. 1996)
1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 36114; 1996 WL 721886

United States v. Cornell Blackwell

Opinion

103 F.3d 120

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Cornell BLACKWELL, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 96-6565.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 26, 1996.
Decided Dec. 17, 1996.

Cornell Blackwell, Appellant Pro Se. James Michael Sullivan, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before HALL, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub.L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Blackwell, Nos. CR-92-62-P; CA-96-68-3-P (W.D.N.C. Mar. 7, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Status
Unpublished