U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Shaka MacUmba Zulu X, Formerly Known as Michael Wayne Montgomery v. Michael B....

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided November 19, 1996

103 F.3d 123; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 36144 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Opinion

103 F.3d 123

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Shaka Macumba ZULU X, formerly known as Michael Wayne
Montgomery, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Michael B. MOORE; Laurie Bessinger, Warden; Deputy Warden
Wessigner; V. Jackson, Prison Guard,
Defendants-Appellees.
Shaka Macumba ZULU X, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
John DOE; Laurie Bessinger; Vaughn Jackson, Captain,
Defendants-Appellees.

Nos. 96-6380, 96-6433.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 15, 1996.
Decided Nov. 19, 1996.

Shaka Macumba Zulu X, Appellant Pro Se.

William Henry Davidson, II, Andrew Frederick Lindemann, ELLIS, LAWHORNE, DAVIDSON & SIMS, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

D.S.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaints. We have reviewed the records and the district court's opinions accepting the magistrate judge's recommendations and find that the complaints, and these appeals, are frivolous. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Zulu X v. Moore, No. CA-95-1605-6-3AK; X v. Doe, No. CA-95-1199-CV-6-3AK (D.S.C. Feb. 28 & Mar. 13, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.