U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

McLamb v. Morris

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided December 19, 1996

104 F.3d 359; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 38062; 1996 WL 729372 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Opinion

104 F.3d 359

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Thomas Lee McLAMB, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
E.C. MORRIS, Deputy Director; W.P. Rogers, Regional
Administrator; C.H. Allen, Regional Ombudsman; J.M.
Holmes, Regional Ombudsman; C.E. Thompson, Warden; LEA,
Institution Investigator; S.R. Whitten, Grievance
Coordinator; H. Crenshaw, Officer; J. Singleton, Officer;
D. Wilson, Officer; W.R. Speede, Officer, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 96-7484.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 12, 1996.
Decided Dec. 19, 1996.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District Judge. (CA-93-933-2)

Thomas Lee McLamb, Appellant Pro Se. Martha Murphey Parrish, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. McLamb v. Morris, No. CA-93-933-2 (E.D. Va. June 20 & Sept. 13, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.