U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Freddy L. Wambach v. Charles M. Creecy, Jr. Gary Dixon Doctor Shah Ms. Lowney

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided December 24, 1996

104 F.3d 360; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 38024; 1996 WL 733930 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Opinion

104 F.3d 360

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Freddy L. WAMBACH, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Charles M. CREECY, Jr.; Gary Dixon; Doctor Shah; Ms.
Lowney, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 96-7247.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 10, 1996.
Decided Dec. 24, 1996.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, District Judge. (CA-96-545-BR)

Freddy L. Wambach, Appellant Pro Se.

E.D.N.C.

DISMISSED.

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant, a North Carolina inmate, appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) (1994), amended by Prison Litigation Reform Act, Pub.L. No. 104-134, 110 Stat. 1321 (1996). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Wambach v. Creecy, No. CA-96-545-BR (E.D.N.C. Aug. 8, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.