Jones v. Lawson
Jones v. Lawson
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7527
DARNELL JONES,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
THOMAS LAWSON; HAROLD A. BLACK; WARDEN OF THE AUGUSTA CORRECTIONAL CENTER,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CA-95-1025-R)
Submitted: December 19, 1995 Decided: January 5, 1996
Before MURNAGHAN and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Darnell Jones, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying
relief on his
28 U.S.C. § 2254(1988) petition. We have reviewed
the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to ap-
peal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.
Jones v. Lawson, No. CA-95-1025-R (W.D. Va. Sept. 19, 1995).* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
* We gather from Appellant's notice of appeal and informal brief to this court that he believes that those documents have begun the exhaustion process. In order to satisfy the exhaustion requirement of
28 U.S.C. § 2254(b), (c), Appellant must initiate a separate proceeding in state court.
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished