Harrison v. Floyd
Harrison v. Floyd
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-6012
DARROL HARRISON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DENNIS FLOYD, Special Drug Enforcement Agent; JOHNNY DANIELS, Special Drug Enforcement Agent; JOHN DOE #I, Director of the Drug Enforcement Agents, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Robert S. Carr, Magistrate Judge. (CA-94-3004-2-18AJ)
Submitted: November 28, 1995 Decided: January 5, 1996 Before HALL, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Darrol Harrison, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the magistrate judge's report and rec- ommendation in his Bivens* action. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1988), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1988); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus- trial Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.
We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
* Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.