U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Beamon v. IBM

Beamon v. IBM
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided January 5, 1996

Beamon v. IBM

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-1383

JAMES E. BEAMON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Daniel E. Klein, Jr., Magistrate Judge. (CA-92-2141-WN)

Submitted: December 19, 1995 Decided: January 5, 1996

Before WIDENER, MURNAGHAN, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James E. Beamon, Appellant Pro Se. J. Hardin Marion, Lynn A.

Kohen, TYDINGS & ROSENBERG, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order that dis- missed his claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (1988) and his pendent state law claims and the magistrate judge's order that granted judgment as a matter of law to the Defendant under Fed. R. Civ. P. 52(c) as to his claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 1994). We have reviewed the record, the district court's opinion, and the magistrate judge's order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court and the magistrate judge. Beamon v. IBM, No. CA-92-2141-WN (D. Md. Apr. 2, 1993 & Feb.

28, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.